Key Takeaways
- Washington’s Child Relocation Act and international law give both parents enforceable rights when a co-parent wants to move with a child, whether across state lines or out of the United States.
- Washington courts treat failure to follow proper notice requirements as bad faith, and it can damage the offending parent’s standing in child custody proceedings.
- The non-relocating parent has 30 days from receiving notice to file a formal objection, or the court may allow the move by default.
- At the relocation hearing, the court normally considers how residential time is currently divided: equal time means neither parent has an advantage, while primary residential time with one parent means the other must prove the move isn’t in the child’s best interests
- The Hague Convention on International Child Abduction gives courts the authority to order the return of a wrongfully removed child, but only applies between the U.S. and signatory countries.
- Washington courts evaluate international relocation requests based on the reasons for the move, the child’s ties to Washington State, the feasibility of maintaining the non-relocating parent’s relationship with the child, and whether the destination country honors U.S. child custody orders.
When you find out that your co-parent intends to move your child out of the U.S., your first impulse is likely fear. Fear that you’ll lose the daily connection you’ve built. Fear that your child will grow up hundreds of miles away and only know you as an occasional visitor or face on a virtual visitation call. Fear that by the time you figure out how to best respond, it’ll be too late.
Washington State’s Child Relocation Act and Washington court rules give both parents rights and responsibilities in a relocation case. They outline:
- What notice the moving parent must give
- How the other parent (you) can object
- How the court normally arrives at a decision in such custody disputes
At ZafiroLaw, we know what you’re going through because we’ve helped many worried parents in your situation. In this guide, we outline what you should do the moment you learn that your ex plans to leave the country, and how a Seattle child custody lawyer can help you protect your rights as a parent.
How to Object to a Child Relocation Order in Washington State
If you receive a relocation notice and you don’t want the move to happen, you have 30 days to act. The first step is to file your objection with the Washington court that issued your parenting plan. Your objection must be in writing and clearly state that you oppose the relocation. Once you file, the court schedules a relocation hearing where both parents present their case.
It is important to note that Washington family courts will take your existing residential schedule into account. This means that:
- If the relocating parent has the majority of residential time under your parenting plan, the CRA presumes the relocation should be permitted. That presumption means that you, the objecting parent, have to prove the move isn’t in your child’s best interests.
- If you and your co-parent share roughly equal residential time, neither parent carries that presumption. The court weighs the evidence from both sides equally.
Once you file your objection, the court can issue temporary custody orders to keep the child in Washington while the case is pending. This prevents the relocating parent from moving before a judge rules. If you believe the other parent may leave without waiting for the court’s decision, you can ask the court to issue an emergency custody order.
During the proceedings, the court may appoint a Guardian ad Litem, an independent investigator who evaluates and reports on what arrangement serves your child’s best interests. Their findings can impact the judge’s decision, so cooperating with that investigation is in your interest.
The Role of the Hague Convention on International Child Abduction
When a parent takes a child across international borders without the other parent’s consent, or refuses to return a child after an approved visit abroad, the situation moves beyond Washington state courts and into international law. The Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction is the international treaty used to order the return of a wrongfully removed child.
The United States ratified the Hague Convention in 1988, and implemented it through federal law under the International Child Abduction Remedies Act (ICARA). The Convention applies between the U.S. and over 100 signatory countries. If your child has been taken to, or wrongfully retained in, a country that has signed the Convention, you can file a Hague Convention application to order your child’s return.
The Convention’s position is that a child who has been wrongfully removed from their home country must be returned promptly. “Wrongful removal” means the move violated your child custody rights and that you were actually exercising those rights at the time of the removal.
How Do You Initiate a Hague Case?
To initiate a Hague case, you file an application through the U.S. Central Authority, which is the Office of Children’s Issues within the U.S. Department of State. That office coordinates with the Central Authority in the country where your child is located. From there, the case goes before a court in that country, which decides whether to order the child’s return.
Note: Courts handling Hague applications don’t re-litigate child custody disputes. They simply determine whether the removal was wrongful and, if so, whether the child should be returned. Custody arrangements are decided separately, by the courts in the child’s home country upon their return.
Does the Hague Always Return Relocated Children?
It depends. The Convention does recognize certain exceptions that can block a return order. For example, a court may refuse to return a child if:
- More than a year has passed since the removal, and the child has become settled in their new environment and cultural conditions.
- There’s a grave risk that returning the child would expose them to physical or psychological harm.
- The child is old enough and sufficiently mature to object to the return.
This doesn’t mean that it’s easy for your ex to take your children out of the United States and stay abroad. On the contrary, these grounds aren’t easy to establish to a court’s satisfaction, so be sure to speak to a Washington family law lawyer.
What if Your Ex Went to a Country That’s Not Part of the Hague?
If your child has been taken to a country that has not signed the Hague Convention, your options are more limited and depend entirely on the laws of that country. Some nations have supportive local authorities, while others don’t. In those situations, contacting an attorney with international family law experience and reaching out to the U.S. Department of State’s Office of Children’s Issues is strongly recommended.
What Washington Courts Look for When a Parent Wants to Move Abroad
When a Washington parent seeks court approval to relocate internationally with a child, the court takes both the Child Relocation Act and the best interests of the child standard into account. Here are some of the main considerations:
- Reason for the Proposed Move: A parent relocating for a confirmed job opportunity, to be closer to extended family, or to escape domestic violence may be regarded differently than a parent with questionable motives. In short, family courts try to determine whether the move appears designed to limit the other parent’s access to the child.
- The Other Parent’s Ability to Maintain a Remote Relationship: The court looks at international transportation costs, time zone differences, the child’s age and school schedule, and whether a revised parenting plan can preserve regular contact (e.g., through video conference apps). A proposed parenting plan that accounts for extended visits during summer vacation, virtual communication, and cost-sharing for travel will be treated more favorably than one that presents visitation difficulties.
- The Child’s Ties to Washington State: The court will consider how long the child has lived here, how well-established their friendships and school relationships are, and their community connections. When a child has deep roots in Washington, international relocation may be treated differently.
- Whether the Destination Country is a Hague Convention Signatory: A move to a non-signatory country means Washington court orders are unenforceable, and the non-relocating parent loses the ability to enforce their parental rights. Family courts may deny relocation on that basis alone.
- The Child’s Preferences: Washington courts don’t give a child veto power over a relocation, but a teenager’s preference may be given more consideration than that of a young child due to the potential for parental influence.
- The Co-parenting Relationship: Finally, the court looks at each parent’s willingness to support the child’s relationship with the other parent. A relocating parent with a documented history of interfering with the other parent’s time will face harder questions from the court than one with a cooperative track record.
Why You Should Call a Seattle Child Custody Lawyer Now
The thought of losing access to your child is a terrifying prospect for any loving parent. When you hire a Seattle family law attorney, they can help by:
- Filing an objection to relocation within the 30-day timeline to prevent the move from being automatically approved.
- Seeking an emergency ex parte court order to stop the relocation or prevent the issuance of passports for international travel.
- Enforcing your Washington State parenting plan.
They help prove the move is not in the child’s best interests under RCW 26.09.520 and can involve U.S. State Department resources to block travel. When you’re dealing with complicated areas like international law and the Hague, legal representation is your best chance of protecting your rights in a custody dispute.
Worried About Relocation? Speak to a Seattle Family Lawyer Today
If you’ve just received a relocation notice from your ex, the 30-day window to file your objection starts now. International moves and abductions bring Washington state law, United States federal law, and international treaties into play simultaneously, and you need an attorney who knows all three.
At ZafiroLaw, founding attorney Katrina S. Zafiro and her team have spent years protecting the rights of worried parents. We know what’s at stake and are prepared to help you manage such an urgent case. For more information or to schedule a no-obligation consultation, please call (206) 309-9645 now.
